Skip to content

Sample report

Sample Full Face Report

This is exactly what you get for $14.99: every section, open, built in the browser from a five-angle scan. Yours is built from your own face, on your device.

Get yours: $14.99

A sample, not a person

Sample report from a synthetic example face, not a real person.

The face is the canonical face mesh with a computed “typical face” deformation, measured by the same engine your scan uses. The five angle photos are shown as mesh drawings because this face has no photo; your report shows your own frames, which never leave your device. A photo upload instead of the camera gives every section except the profile and the five angles.

1Cover

S-SAMPLE15 Oct 20265 angles, 40 frames

Face Report

40 frames from 5 angles, measured on this device. 9 sections, each drawn from your own landmarks.

5.1/ 10

Average

Scan
S-SAMPLE
Date
15 Oct 2026
Source
Guided camera scan
Angles
front, turned left, turned right, chin up, chin down
Frames fused
8 front, 40 in all
Weighting
neutral weights

Opens the print dialog; choose “Save as PDF”.

Fig. 1.1Your face as the scan measured it: the 468 mesh landmarks of your fused front burst, turning in 3D.

2Attractiveness

Average.

5.1/ 10

A documented geometric formula over measured components: not a model trained on human ratings, and not a percentile of real people.

Composite 50.6 of 100 → 5.1 on the 1–10 curve, where a typical face is 50 → 5.0. Neutral weights.

Table 2.1Components, 0–100, and their weights. A typical face is near 50.

  • Symmetry40
  • Averageness49
  • Proportions63
  • Eyes and brows47
  • Jaw and chin48
  • Profile60

Strengths

  • Facial thirds are close to even (32/34/34%), which scores well.
  • Chin sits 2.2% of face height in front of the vertical through the bridge of the nose, which scores well.

Holding it back

  • Left and right sides differ by 4.2% of the eye-corner span against about 3% on a typical face, most around the eyes, which lowers the score.
  • Canthal tilt is -0.4° (outer corners below the inner corners), flatter than the mean face's 1.7°, which lowers the score.
  • Chin is narrow (28% of cheekbone width against 30% on the mean face), which lowers the score.
Table 2.2Every measure behind the components: your value, the mean face’s, and its 0–100 sub-score (50 = a typical face).
MeasureYouMean face0–100
Proportions
Facial thirds (RMS distance from even)0.0080.01169
Horizontal fifths (RMS distance from even)0.0320.02958
Eye spacing (eye centres ÷ face width)40.3%40.7%63
Eyes and brows
Canthal tilt−0.4°1.7°42
Eye openness (height ÷ width)0.210.2152
Eye width ÷ face width16.6%16.7%50
Jaw and chin
Jaw width ÷ cheekbone width0.760.7851
Jaw corner angle (front view)134.3°132.2°47
Chin width ÷ cheekbone width27.9%30.1%46
Profile
Gonial angle (side view)126.5°124.9°45
Chin projection (÷ face height)+2.2%−0.4%79
Nose projection (÷ face height)+17.6%+18.6%64
Nasolabial angle124.6°116.0°55
Cheekbone prominence17.5%17.7%51

Symmetry and averageness have no sub-measures: they are scored directly from the mirror mismatch (section 6) and the distance from the average face shape.

3Face shape

Oval, a clear match.

95% confidence in oval over the next closest shape

FCJL
Fig. 3.1F forehead, C cheekbone and J jaw width; L face length (top of the mesh to the chin). Your landmarks, fused over 8 front frames and rotated to frontal.

Your face is a little longer than it is wide, with the forehead slightly wider than the jaw and a softly rounded jawline. Because no single dimension stands out strongly, a wide range of styles can work for you.

Table 3.1The four numbers the shape is classified from.
RatioYou
Face length ÷ cheekbone width1.15
Forehead width ÷ cheekbone width0.81
Jaw width ÷ cheekbone width0.76
Forehead width ÷ jaw width1.07
Jaw corner angle134.3°

Hairstyles

  • A textured crop or short quiff, which keeps your natural length and width as they are.
  • A classic taper or side part, short at the sides with a little more length on top.
  • Shoulder-length layers or a long bob, worn straight or wavy.
  • Long hair with a center or side part; most partings sit well on this shape.
  • Curtain bangs or a soft fringe, if you’d like to shorten the look of the forehead.

Glasses frames

  • Most frame shapes can work; frames about as wide as the widest part of your face tend to sit most naturally.
  • Rectangular or geometric frames, if you want to add a little structure.
  • Aviators or soft wayfarer-style frames.
  • Larger round frames, for a bolder look.

Facial hair

  • If you grow facial hair, short stubble or a close-trimmed full beard follows your existing outline.
  • If you grow facial hair, a medium-length beard trimmed evenly at the sides and chin is an easy option.
  • If you grow facial hair, a moustache or goatee works too, since there’s no strong width or length to balance.

Jaw and chin, front view

Chin is narrow (28% of cheekbone width against 30% on the mean face), which lowers the score. The jaw and chin component scores 48.

Table 3.2Lower-face widths and the jaw corner seen from the front, against the mean face.
MeasureYouMean face0–100
Jaw width ÷ cheekbone width0.760.7851
Jaw corner angle (front view)134.3°132.2°47
Chin width ÷ cheekbone width27.9%30.1%46
  • Your jaw is 76% as wide as your cheekbones, close to the mean face (78%).
  • Seen from the front, your jaw corners measure 134°, close to the mean face (132°).
  • Your chin is 28% of your cheekbone width: narrow compared with the mean face (30%).

4Profile

Profile 60 of 100, above a typical face.

Chin sits 2.2% of face height in front of the vertical through the bridge of the nose, which scores well.

127°nose +17.6%chin +2.2%nasion
Fig. 4.1Side view of your right side from the turned scan, drawn facing right: the midline from forehead to chin (ink), the jaw (blue), and the vertical through the nasion (dashed). Projections are fractions of nasion-to-chin height.
Table 4.1Side-view measures: the jaw angle in profile, chin and nose in front of the nasion vertical (fractions of nasion-to-chin height), the nose-to-upper-lip angle, and the cheekbone bulge. Confidence 0–1 combines how far the head turned, how steady the burst was and how well the turn agrees with the front view; below 0.5 a measure is not reported.
MeasureYouMeanSideConf.
Gonial angle126.5°124.9°both0.97
Chin projection+2.2%−0.4%both0.95
Nose projection+17.6%+18.6%both0.98
Nasolabial angle124.6°116.0°both0.72
Cheekbone prominence17.5%17.7%both0.98

Measured from the left turn (−25.0°, 8 frames, right side towards the camera) and the right turn (+25.0°, 8 frames, left side towards the camera).

A 25° turn is not a profile photo. Depth comes from MediaPipe’s 3D estimate of the mesh, sharpened by the turned view, and the gonial angle is a soft-tissue angle that a beard hides. The nasolabial angle rests on a single mesh vertex; compare it with the mean face, not with clinical norms.

5Eyes

Neutral canthal tilt, −0.4°.

Inner and outer corners sit at about the same height, inside the ±2° band where the label can change from one scan to the next.

Right eye
−4.3°
Left eye
+3.4°
Fig. 5.1Canthal tilt per eye at true angle: inner corner to outer corner against the line joining the inner corners. Fused value, ±1.5° across 8 frames. The label uses a ±2° neutral band. Left/right assume the photo is not mirrored.

Canthal tilt is -0.4° (outer corners below the inner corners), flatter than the mean face's 1.7°, which lowers the score. The eyes and brows component scores 47.

Table 5.1Eye geometry on the frontal mesh, against the mean face.
MeasureYouMean face
Canthal tilt, both eyes−0.4°1.7°
Openness, height ÷ width (right 0.22, left 0.21)0.210.21
Eye width ÷ face width16.6%16.7%
Eye-centre spacing ÷ face width40.3%40.7%
Gap between the eyes ÷ eye width1.421.00 (canon)
Brow height ÷ eye width0.57–
  • Your eyes are 0.21 as tall as they are wide, close to the mean face (0.21).
  • Each eye spans 16.6% of your face width, close to the mean face (16.7%).
  • The centres of your eyes are 40.3% of your face width apart, close to the mean face (40.7%).

Measuring it consistently

  • Phone at eye level, chin level, eyes on the lens.
  • Relaxed face: no smile, no raised brows.
  • Soft light from the front, so both eyes are lit the same.
  • Glasses off, hair away from the eyes, no heavy eyeliner.
  • Arm’s length or further, and the same setup each time you compare.

6Symmetry

59 out of 100: mild left–right differences.

Symmetry mirrors the subject’s right side onto the left across the fitted midline, over all 220 left–right point pairs of the mesh, after removing what a leftover head turn would explain. 100 is a perfect mirror. A typical face’s mismatch, about 3% of the eye-corner span, measures 74 on this scale. ±1.0 across the 8 front frames.

Left and right sides differ by 4.2% of the eye-corner span against about 3% on a typical face, most around the eyes, which lowers the score. The symmetry component scores 40.

Fig. 6.1Mirror match by region against a typical face (74, neutral): teal is closer to a mirror, blue a clearer mismatch. Your landmarks, fused over 8 front frames and rotated to frontal.
Table 6.1Mirror match by region, 0–100, lowest first.
Region0–100
Eyes35
Forehead46
Brows51
Cheeks57
Mouth66
Jawline80
Nose88
  • Your left and right sides differ noticeably. Part of this can come from expression, uneven light or a slightly turned head, which a relaxed, straight-on scan removes.
  • Your right eye sits slightly higher than your left one.

7Proportions

Proportions 63 of 100, above a typical face.

Facial thirds are close to even (32/34/34%), which scores well.

Upper 32Middle 34Lower 341917241724
Fig. 7.1Thirds (blue lines; the hairline, dashed, is estimated) and fifths at eye level (teal), as percentages. Your landmarks, fused over 8 front frames and rotated to frontal.

Vertical thirds, % of face height

32
34
34
UpperMiddleLower

Upper 32%, Middle 34%, Lower 34%; even is 33% each.

Thirds split the face height at the brows and at the base of the nose. The neoclassical canon makes them equal, and the score measures the distance from an even split. The upper third is estimated: there is no hairline landmark.

Horizontal fifths, % of face width at eye level

19
17
24
17
24
SideEyeGapEyeSide

Side 19%, Eye 17%, Gap 24%, Eye 17%, Side 24%; even is 20% each.

Fifths split the face width at eye level at the four eye corners. The canon makes all five one eye wide, and the score measures the distance from an even split.

Table 7.1Classical reference ratios: your value, then the canon.
RatioYouCanon
Gap between the eyes ÷ eye width1.421.00
Mouth width ÷ nose width1.301.618 (golden)
Face length ÷ cheekbone width1.381.618 (golden)

The classical canon puts one eye width between the eyes (1.00). The score does not use this ratio; it scores the spacing of the eye centres against the mean face. The golden-ratio references are art-history canons, not research findings, and the score does not use them.

  • Your facial thirds (hairline to brows, brows to nose, nose to chin) are close to evenly balanced.
  • The upper third is an estimate, because the hairline cannot be detected reliably.
  • The gap between your eyes is about 1.4 times the width of one eye.
  • Your nose is about 77% of the width of your mouth.

8What would move it

What would move the score.

Bone structure does not change with grooming. What changes is how it reads and how it measures: hair and beard sit on the outline points, posture and camera height change the angles the scan sees, and soft tissue covers the jaw and cheekbones. Each item answers one detractor from section 2.

  1. 1Symmetry, 40 of 100

    Left and right sides differ by 4.2% of the eye-corner span against about 3% on a typical face, most around the eyes, which lowers the score.

    • Scan conditionsScan rested, with both eyes relaxed and open. A half-blink or a squint on one side counts as asymmetry.
    • Scan conditionsLight from straight ahead, a relaxed face and the phone square to it. Side light, a half-smile or one raised brow all measure as asymmetry.
  2. 2Eyes and brows, 47 of 100

    Canthal tilt is -0.4° (outer corners below the inner corners), flatter than the mean face's 1.7°, which lowers the score.

    • GroomingCanthal tilt is set by bone and lid structure, and grooming does not move the measured corners. Brows with a lifted, tapered tail make the eye area read more upswept.
    • Posture and cameraPhone at eye level, head level and square to it. Pose correction removes most of a nod or a turn, not all of it.
  3. 3Jaw and chin, 48 of 100

    Chin is narrow (28% of cheekbone width against 30% on the mean face), which lowers the score.

    • Hair and beardIf you grow facial hair, a short beard kept square at the chin broadens it.
    • Body compositionSoft tissue at the jaw corners rounds them. At a lower body-fat level the corners read more angular, and this measure follows the outline, not the bone.
    • Posture and cameraHead level, chin slightly forward, phone at eye level. A raised chin or a camera below the jaw softens the corners.
  4. 4For an oval face

    • Hair and beardA textured crop or short quiff, which keeps your natural length and width as they are.
    • Hair and beardA classic taper or side part, short at the sides with a little more length on top.
    • GlassesMost frame shapes can work; frames about as wide as the widest part of your face tend to sit most naturally.
    • Hair and beardIf you grow facial hair, short stubble or a close-trimmed full beard follows your existing outline.

This report does not give medical or surgical advice.

9Method and limits

How it was measured, and what it can’t see.

MediaPipe Face Landmarker tracked 478 points on 40 frames across 5 angles, on this device. Each angle’s burst was fused into one set of landmarks (the per-point median), the face was rotated to frontal in 3D, and the profile was read from the turned views. Every measure is an angle or a ratio, so image size and distance cancel out. The score is a weighted composite of symmetry ×0.20, averageness ×0.20, proportions ×0.15, eyes and brows ×0.15, jaw and chin ×0.15, profile ×0.15, mapped to 1–10 by a fixed curve.

Table 9.1Scan quality. Frame-to-frame SD is single-frame noise; the fused values are steadier.
MeasureValue
Front frames fused8
Frames across all angles40
Canthal tilt, frame-to-frame SD1.47°
Symmetry score, frame-to-frame SD0.96
Head pose, frontyaw 0.0°, pitch 0.0°
Head pose, turned leftyaw −25.0°, pitch 0.0°
Head pose, turned rightyaw +25.0°, pitch 0.0°
Head pose, chin upyaw 0.0°, pitch +15.0°
Head pose, chin downyaw 0.0°, pitch −15.0°

Known limits

  • The reference points of the score are judgement calls centred on MediaPipe’s average face. They are not yet fitted to real scans or to rated photos.
  • Canthal tilt is the noisiest measure: about ±0.7° after fusing 8 frames, more from a single photo. Its label has a ±2° neutral band for that reason.
  • A camera closer than arm’s length enlarges the nose and narrows the face edges, which shifts every ratio and the averageness residual.
  • Jaw, chin and cheekbone points sit on the visible outline, so hair, beards, high collars and glasses move them.
  • The profile comes from 25° turns. Only about 42% of a depth difference shows in the image at that angle; the rest is the network’s 3D estimate.
  • The upper third is estimated from the brow and forehead points: MediaPipe has no hairline landmark.
  • Expression moves the eye measures and symmetry: squinting, smiling, a raised brow or a half-blink all count.
  • An uploaded photo saved mirrored swaps left and right. The scan’s camera frames are not mirrored.

The full method: formula, weights and sources

Face Analysis Lab · Full Face ReportS-SAMPLE15 Oct 2026Measured on this device. No image was uploaded.

Your own report

Get this report for your face

$14.99once, no subscription

The report is built from the scan in your browser tab. If you haven’t scanned yet, unlock it now and then scan your face; it stays unlocked on this browser for 24 hours.

Nothing leaves your device. 14-day refund.

Paid once through Stripe: card, Apple Pay or Google Pay. No account, no subscription.